Poem-a-Day April 24: Pocket-Sized Indian

Hello Friends —

1) If you’re in the Bay Area, don’t miss the opportunity to hear today’s poet Sherman Alexie at Stanford, for FREE and open to the public, tomorrow Friday April 25 at 7:30pm.

2) Today is Poem in Your Pocket Day! #pocketpoem For more details on the meaning of this holiday and its origins, see my April 2013 ramble on why pair poems with pockets here. You can also download my own PDF of the pocket-sized poems I’ll be passing out on street corners this weekend, all ready for you to print at home for your own distribution purposes!

Heretofore the dihedral angle formed by 1) and 2) gives us a 90-degree chance that today’s selection is a pocket-sized poem by Sherman Alexie.

Enjoy.
Ellen


Aware, Unaware

Be quick now and pull to the roadside
Because bad drivers don’t know they’re bad drivers,
And the architects of genocide
Always think they’re the survivors.


Find more pocket poems by Sherman Alexie on Mudlark (“An Electronic Journal of Poetry & Poetics: never in print and never out of print…”) and on Sherman Alexie’s website fallsapart.com (where the homepage currently contains more excellent examples of the poetic device juxtaposition).

Poem-a-Day April 23: star-crossed

ROMEO speaks about JULIET:
(Excerpt from the first monologue of Act II, scene II)

Two of the fairest stars in all the heaven
Having some business, do entreat her eyes
To twingle in their spheres till they return.
What if her eyes were there, they in her head?
The brightness of her cheek would shame those stars,
As daylight doth a lamp; her eye in heaven
Would through the airy region stream so bright,
That bird would sing, and think it were not night.

JULIET speaks about ROMEO:
(Excerpt from the first monologue of Act III, scene II)

Give me my Romeo: and, when he shall die,
Take him and cut him out in little stars,
And he will make the face of heaven so fine,
That all the world will be in love with night…


Hello Friends—

Here’s an assertion for you: No writer in English will ever be able to use the word “star-crossed” (or “star-cross’d”) without it being a reference to Shakespeare.

Now send in your examples to disprove that assertion. Or: What other writers do you feel can be invoked with just a single word, who uniquely own that particular word, like (in my opinion) Shakespeare alone owns “star-crossed” — not because they invented the word, but because they used the word that unforgettably.

Virginia Woolf mentions Shakespeare’s “word-coining power” in a journal entry:

“I read Shakespeare directly after I have finished writing, when my mind is agape and red and hot. Then it is astonishing. I never yet knew how amazing his stretch and speed and word-coining power is, until I felt it utterly outpace and outrace my own, seeming to start equal and then I see him draw ahead and do things I could not in my wildest tumult and utmost press of mind imagine.”

And, because I am very jealous of all the folks who went to see Anna Deveare Smith speak on Shakespeare’s Birthday (did I mention April 23 is his birthday yet?) at a free and open to the public event on Stanford’s campus this evening, I’ll leave you with her words on Shakespeare’s influence. What most resonates with me is Anna Deveare Smith’s articulation that the most valuable things we learn from studying Shakespeare are not definitive answers but the ability to question; we learn how to pursue inquiries about our human existence.

Enjoy.
Ellen

Poem-a-Day April 22: Touched with Fire

Rabbits and Fire

Everything’s been said
But one last thing about the desert,
And it’s awful: During brush fires in the Sonoran desert,
Brush fires that happen before the monsoon and in the great,
Deep, wide, and smothering heat of the hottest months,
The longest months,
The hypnotic, immeasurable lulls of August and July—
During these summer fires, jackrabbits—
Jackrabbits and everything else
That lives in the brush of the rolling hills,
But jackrabbits especially—
Jackrabbits can get caught in the flames,
No matter how fast and big and strong and sleek they are.
And when they’re caught,
Cornered in and against the thick
Trunks and thin spines of the cactus,
When they can’t back up any more,
When they can’t move, the flame—
It touches them,
And their fur catches fire.
Of course, they run away from the flame,
Finding movement even when there is none to be found,
Jumping big and high over the wave of fire, or backing
Even harder through the impenetrable
Tangle of hardened saguaro
And prickly pear and cholla and barrel,
But whichever way they find,
What happens is what happens: They catch fire
And then bring the fire with them when they run.
They don’t know they’re on fire at first,
Running so fast as to make the fire
Shoot like rocket engines and smoke behind them,
But then the rabbits tire
And the fire catches up,
Stuck on them like the needles of the cactus,
Which at first must be what they think they feel on their skins.
They’ve felt this before, every rabbit.
But this time the feeling keeps on.
And of course, they ignite the brush and dried weeds
All over again, making more fire, all around them.
I’m sorry for the rabbits.
And I’m sorry for us
To know this.


Hello Friends —

Today is Earth Day, and the Earth’s report-back to us this year is Not Good.

Right here in California, we’re having possibly our worst drought in more than 500 years (there’s a great little “Beyond A Reasonable Drought” quiz at www.californiaquiz.org), and yet I keep coming across people who very casually “don’t know” or “forgot” that we’re having any kind of drought at all; who actually frown and complain on the 2 out of 365 days it’s overcast in Southern California from something other than smog or massive wildfire smoke, or heaven forbid it actually rains here.

And here’s the thing: that is a 100% totally natural reaction. It’s an adaptive survival trait for the human mind to suppress thoughts that are just too massive and too depressing to comprehend — like drought. Or climate change. Or “we’re all gonna die.” Those may be true thoughts, but they’re not useful thoughts for a human just trying to get through one day and into the next day.

But if we’re going to survive not just day-to-day, but year-to-year, decade-to-decade, humans have to break through that adaptive suppression of some of those Big Dark Thoughts. And that’s where the poets (those “Touched with Fire”) come in and start hurtling rabbit-fireballs.

I would argue that the scientists have (more or less) done, and continue to do, their part — they’ve used reason and logic and numbers to try to convince the other humans of what we need to do to save ourselves. We (more or less) have the science to clean up the Pacific Garbage Patch, re-freeze glaciers, re-plant rainforests, maybe even repair the hole in the ozone and temper human population growth. We (more or less) have fiscal and governmental entities massive enough to implement that kind of global project. What we don’t have are the hearts and minds of the ever-growing masses.

I would argue it’s the poets (and I use “poets” loosely, for all those engaged in the arts of winning hearts and minds) who still have the most work to do if we are going to save ourselves from ourselves — and those poets, we poets, are running out of time.

I have a lot more to say about today’s poem by Alberto Ríos, the inaugural state poet laureate of Arizona, his choice of rabbits, and fire, the location of humans in the poem, the science behind what makes for a memorable poetic image, the fine line between depressing messages and messages that motivate action — but this is all getting quite long. So, let’s skip ahead to the single most hope-inducing, optimistic thing I have heard said about our chances, as a species, of not killing the entire planet right out from under our own feet. It comes from a prominent ecologist in the area of climate change impact on species’ survival, Chris Thomas:

“If nature can bounce back from an asteroid hit, it can probably bounce back from us.”

Happy Earth Day, and here’s to many more.

Love,
Ellen

Poem-a-Day April 21: Singing Whitman

Hello Friends,

You have all heard Walt Whitman’s poetry — but only a lucky few of you have had the opportunity to hear him like this. The extraordinary Daniel Redman has given us a new way to receive Whitman’s words, by setting the poems of Leaves of Grass to song. As the Poetry Foundation describes it, “His performances blend the tradition of ecstatic music and Jewish prayer with the lilting, loping music of America’s passionate bard, an oddly resonant combination.”

Hear for yourself. If you listen long enough, Daniel will even connect Whitman to Whitney via The Wiz. He’s that good.

Enjoy.
Ellen


To thee old cause!
Thou peerless, passionate, good cause,
Thou stern, remorseless, sweet idea,
Deathless throughout the ages, races, lands,
After a strange sad war, great war for thee,
(I think all war through time was really fought, and ever will be
really fought, for thee,)
These chants for thee, the eternal march of thee.

(A war O soldiers not for itself alone,
Far, far more stood silently waiting behind, now to advance in this book.)

Thou orb of many orbs!
Thou seething principle! thou well-kept, latent germ! thou centre!
Around the idea of thee the war revolving,
With all its angry and vehement play of causes,
(With vast results to come for thrice a thousand years,)
These recitatives for thee,—my book and the war are one,
Merged in its spirit I and mine, as the contest hinged on thee,
As a wheel on its axis turns, this book unwitting to itself,
Around the idea of thee.


Excerpted from Leaves of Grass (1871) by Walt Whitman

Click here for a little more historical context on the political slogan “good old cause.”

Poem-a-Day April 20: Token

Token Loss

To the dragon
any loss is
total. His rest
is disrupted
if a single
jewel encrusted
goblet has
been stolen.
The circle
of himself
in the nest
of his gold
has been
broken. No
loss is token.


“Token Loss” by recent U.S. Poet Laureate Kay Ryan has not yet been published in a book, but was released as part of the Academy of American Poets more official-like poem-a-day series in January 2014.

Poem-a-Day April 19: the girl inside

Mama Said


Hello Friends—

I must confess I strongly considered just sending you all This Llama Frolicking to DMX instead of a poem today. And then I thought perhaps I’d send you Denise Levertov’s “Come into Animal Presence” and secretly hyperlink to the frolicking every time the world “llama” appears in that poem. But then I worried I’d already sent a disproportionate number of animal-related poems this April, what with all the birds and the whale and such, so: that’s how we arrived back at a poem about people — specifically today: grandmothers, and the men who flirt with them. Poet Mary Moore Easter is a professor of Dance emerita who I am going to guess is enjoying her retirement to the fullest.

“Mama Said …” appeared in the April 2013 issue of Poetry magazine and was also selected for the New York Times Poetry-News Pairings series (to complement the article “Oldest Woman in New York Celebrates Birthday No. 114.”)

Enjoy.
Ellen

Poem-a-Day April 18: A Field Guide to North American Blurbs

July, waxwings
on the berries
have dyed red
the dead

branch


Hello Friends—

There’s a bit of Ezra Pound’s “In a Station of the Metro” in today’s untitled poem by Lorine Niedecker — another selection coming to you because of a gift given to me: a new friend Christie introduced me to the Wisconsin poet Lorine Niedecker (Thanks, Christie!). Niedecker’s biographer calls her “America’s Greatest Unknown Poet,” an impossible claim. But I can say this: Niedecker’s The Granite Pail: Selected Poems may have claim to the single greatest “blurb” I have ever encountered on the back cover of a poetry collection:

“The book is a good one in the way I want books of poems to be good. It is good poetry. It is difficult and warm. It has life to it.” — WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS

I’m not sure if you have to have read a lot of blurbs on the backs of poetry books, and/or a lot of William Carlos Williams, to appreciate this gem, or if it’ll come across even if you just have a sense of what the blurbs on the backs of books are like more generally — you’ll have to write back and let me know. I wish that Jake Adam York were alive for me to share this blurb with — he wrote a little piece for the Kenyon Review called “A Field Guide to North American Blurbs” and I just know that he would love it.

Happy National Poetry Month!
Ellen

Poem-a-Day April 17: Eso es todo.

Hello Friends,

I find Gabriel García Márquez occupying the space in my thoughts where poetry month should be this evening. But Márquez didn’t think very highly of his own early forays into poetry — so I am not going to embarrass him by sharing them, even if I think they were quite good.

Instead, a poem that García Márquez loved all his life: one story goes that a teenage “Gabo” got in trouble with the jesuit fathers in secondary school for memorizing Pablo Neruda’s “Poema XX” and reciting it several times a day. Fittingly, Neruda was just a teenager himself when he wrote “Poema XX,” published in his poetry collection Viente poemas de amor y una canción de desesperada / Twenty Love Poems and One Song of Despair in 1924, when Neruda was just 19 years old (and three years before Gabriel García Márquez was born).

Later in life, García Márquez would call Neruda “the greatest poet of the 20th century in any language.” Neruda, in turn, had the chance to call Márquez’s most famous novel, Cien años de soledad / One Hundred Years of Solitude, “the greatest revelation in the Spanish language since Don Quixote.”

Enjoy.
Ellen


XX PUEDO ESCRIBIR

Puedo escribir los versos más tristes esta noche.

Escribir, por ejemplo: «La noche está estrellada,
y tiritan, azules, los astros, a los lejos».

El viento de la noche gira en el cielo y canta.

Puedo escribir los versos más tristes esta noche.
Yo la quise, y a veces ella también me quiso.

En las noches como ésta la tuve entre mis brazos.
La besé tantas veces bajo el cielo infinito.

Ella me quiso, a veces yo también la quería.
Cómo no haber amado sus grandes ojos fijos.

Puedo escribir los versos más tristes esta noche.
Pensar que no la tengo. Sentir que la he perdido.

Oír la noche inmensa, más inmensa sin ella.
Y el verso cae al alma como al pasto el rocío.

Qué importa que mi amor no pudiera guardarla.
La noche está estrellada y ella no está conmigo.

Eso es todo. A lo lejos alguien canta. A lo lejos.
Mi alma no se contenta con haberla perdido.

XX TONIGHT I CAN WRITE

Tonight I can write the saddest lines.

Write, for example, ‘The night is starry
and the stars are blue and shiver in the distance.’

The night wind revolves in the sky and sings.

Tonight I can write the saddest lines.
I loved her, and sometimes she loved me too.

Through nights like this one I held her in my arms.
I kissed her again and again under the endless sky.

She loved me, sometimes I loved her too.
How could one not have loved her great still eyes.

Tonight I can write the saddest lines.
To think that I do not have her. To feel that I have lost her.

To hear the immense night, still more immense without her.
And the verse falls to the soul like dew to the pasture.

What does it matter that my love could not keep her.
The night is starry and she is not with me.

This is all. In the distance someone is singing. In the distance.
My soul is not satisfied that is has lost her.


Pablo Neruda was also featured for Poem-a-Day April 13, 2007.

W.S. Merwin’s English translation of Neruda’s Viente poemas de amor y una canción de desesperada, Twenty Love Poems and a Song of Despair, was first published in 1969.

Poem-a-Day April 16: Carnival of Force

The Barnacle and the Gray Whale
Said the Barnacle,
You enchant me, with your carnival
of force.

Yours is a system of slow.

There is you, the pulley
and there is you, the weight.

Your eyes wide on a hymn.

Your deep song like the turn
of that first,

that earliest of wheels.

Said the Whale,
I have seen you, little encruster,
in that business of fouling the ships.

Known, little drum machine, you
to tease out food from the drink.

Little thimble of chalk and hard water.

You could be a callus of whiter skin.

You could be a knucklebone. You
who hang on me,

like a conscience.


Hello Friends,

There were so many cetacean visitors breaking the surface of my dreams last night — gray whales, great blue whales, humpbacks, orcas, a pair of Dall’s porpoises, belugas, sperm whales, right whales, wrong whales, some whales I don’t think exist, some whales I definitely know don’t exist. Perhaps something was weighing on my mind… Which weighs more, several dozen whales, all floating freely, swimming, dancing, leaping about, or one tiny nagging barnacle in a spot you can neither see nor reach?

Today’s imagined dialogue between a whale and a barnacle is the work of Cecilia Llompart, first published earlier this year as part of the Academy of American Poets‘ more official-like poem-a-day list.

For another take on whales, weight, the pulley, see poem-a-day April 2, 2007 “Weight, In Passing” by Andrea Haslanger.

Cheers,
Ellen

Poem-a-Day April 14: Buddhist Math

Imaginary Number

The mountain that remains when the universe is destroyed
is not big and is not small.
Big and small are

comparative categories, and to what
could the mountain that remains when the universe is destroyed
be compared?

Consciousness observes and is appeased.
The soul scrambles across the screes.
The soul,

like the square root of minus 1,
is an impossibility that has its uses.


Hello Friends,
Vijay Seshadri won the Pulitzer Prize in Poetry today, so I figured he deserved a poem-a-day. This one is for the math nerds especially!
Enjoy.
Ellen

P.S. Blogspot informs me that my Gorgeous Nothings post yesterday was a bit of a milestone: my 200th poem-a-day!*

* That math is (7 Aprils) time (30 days in April) minus (2012 [skipped April]) plus (a scattered stray or two) plus (13 poem-a-days this April) = more or less 200 somewhere hereabouts.